• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

ZachEvans

Believer. Husband. Dad. Coach. Healthcare Thought-Leader. All-Around Good Guy.

  • Home
  • About
    • My Life’s To-Do List
    • Reading To My Kids
    • My Trip to England
    • My Trip to China
    • My Trip to Honduras
  • Thoughts
    • Healthcare
    • Leadership
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Technology
    • Family
    • Miscellany
  • Resources
    • Business
    • Youth Sports
    • Adoption
  • Projects
  • Contact

Entrepreneurship

David or Goliath: Start-Up or Big Company

June 26, 2014 by Zach Evans

I have had the good fortune to work with both start-ups and Fortune 100 companies (#79 in 2014, to be exact) in my career. Working with David or Goliath carries with it both positives and negatives and when you are considering going to work for a company you need to ensure that these characteristics match up with your own personality and needs.

David (The Start-Up)

Pros

Flexibility and agility
Wide individual scope of work
Palatable energy
Passion fueled
Newness
Undefined culture
Define your own career path
Broader individual impact

Cons

Instability and risk
Constrained resources
Passion fueled (yes, it goes both ways)
Unproven business model
High stress / long hours
Identifying the next big thing is tough
Risk of being crushed by larger, more financially stable companies

Goliath (The Big Company)

Pros

Resources (people, money, technology, etc.)
Established business model
Stability (or at least the sense of stability)
Organizational history
Defined culture
Learn the art of politics
Broader corporate impact
Time to reflect on lessons learned

Cons

Bureaucracy
Limited individual scope of work
Risk of being undercut by smaller, more nimble companies
Organizational history (this goes both ways, too)
Frustration of company politics
Slow career growth
Being pigeon holed as a specialist

Most of these pros and cons are based on potential for good or bad but as you think of the type of company you want to work for it is important to decide if you are willing to accept the risks associated with any given size of company.

As I think of additional items to add to my lists I will do so but please feel free to contact me with anything you think needs to be added to either David’s or Goliath’s score card.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurship Tagged With: Career, Careers, Entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship, Risk

The Question To Ask

February 14, 2014 by Zach Evans

I have been a part of a few start-up companies and have learned quite a bit along the way. One question that many early employee candidates of start-ups struggle with is how to ask for equity in the company they are being asked to help build (assuming there is not a formal program in place). I have helped frame this question in a few different ways but a friend of mine, Gary Peat, put it as concisely as I have heard it said:

What do I need to do to earn an equity position in this company?

I like the way this particular question is framed because 1) it puts the onus on the company to stake out what performance level it requires to grant equity and 2) it allows the candidate to put forth he question in an humble manner because he or she wants to earn that which will be granted. In the era of 140-character abbreviated rants, it is nice to see how a well-phrased question can make all the difference in the world as to how it will be received.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurship Tagged With: Entrepreneurship, Equity, Start-Ups

Marginable Revenue

April 25, 2013 by Zach Evans

There are several memorable quotes from The Princess Bride but there is one exchange that I have always loved:

Vizzini: He didn’t fall? Inconceivable.

Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

I have been accused, occasionally  of misusing words but I rarely make one up completely. I have been working on a new word for a while, however: Marginable Revenue.

Marginable Revenue is not the same thing as marginal revenue (which is what Google tries to suggest) nor is it the same as contribution margin. Let me explain what marginable revenue is.

I have worked for two companies that are service companies that purchase a great deal of supplies and services from sub-contractors and pass them on to their clients with zero mark-up. If we paid $1 for something then our client paid $1 for something. We made our money through administrative and program fees.

We still counted the pass-through costs as top-line revenue, however, even though they would be zeroed-out by an expense line down to the last penny. Why would we do this? It made our companies look larger than we actually were. Top-line revenues could be shown to be several times larger than what our administrative and program fees were was but our operating margins and EBITDA were minuscule.

It was an accounting trick that tired to obscure the actual operating financials of the companies. It is a tempting option but one than can render decision making more difficult than it should be. That is why I like to evaluate marginable revenue.

Marginable revenue (by my definition) only looks at top-line revenue that has margin attached to it and, therefore, could contribute to the organization’s bottom line. Any pass-through revenue would be ignored, which give a more accurate view of what is happening inside the business.

While this may mean that a company feels “smaller” than they used to, what does it really matter how much top-line revenue you have if none of that revenue carries any margin?

Filed Under: Entrepreneurship Tagged With: Entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship, Financials, Margin, Revenue

14 Lessons Learned from Start-Up Failure

October 26, 2012 by Zach Evans

I have had the good fortune to be a part of several start-ups and early-stage companies. No two opportunities will be exactly the same (and certainly will not end the same) but there are many lessons that can be learned from the experience. Many of the lessons I have gleaned come from successes, but many were derived from failures.

In no particular order, here are my 14 Lessons Learned from Start-Up Failure:

  1. Be transparent in everything you do – Being transparent is not the same thing as not keeping secrets. All companies (and all people) have secrets and many of these should be kept by a small group of individuals so that they cannot be exploited by others. Being transparent means always telling the truth—even when you need to withhold some information for legitimate reasons. At the first start-up I joined—where I was employee #1 after the founders—we ran in to a lean period in terms of our angel funding. Basically, we were running out of money. Rather than talking with the employees (there was more than just me at this point), paychecks just stopped showing up. Multiple paychecks. Instead of being transparent, the founder would keep the door of his office closed on paydays or work from home. I will leave it to your imagination as to what this did to morale and trust.
  2. A sales pipeline is not the same thing as actual sales – When talking with potential investors, employee candidates or even clients, it is tempting to discuss a start-up’s sales pipeline in the same manner that one might speak about actual sales. Not only is this not transparent to potential partners but it is probably outright lying, especially if you do not qualify your sales pipeline with likelihood-to-close percentages. You may think it sounds better to talk about your $3 million pipeline but if your close rate is 0.1% and you have not actually sold anything yet this will come back to haunt you in the future. Additionally, knowing the size of a potential market or client is not the same thing as having an identified lead that should be included in your pipeline. It may not look as impressive, but it is better to be conservative and then over-deliver.
  3. Bootstrap as long as you can – A question all start-ups have to answer is: “When do we take in outside investment capital (if ever)?” The answer to this question will be different for all companies but you should certainly try to bootstrap as long as you possibly can. For some, this may be no time at all because you are trying to capitalize on a Blue Ocean opportunity and need to get to market quickly and then scale even more quickly. For others, this may be years. Whatever the situation your company is in, try to make it as long as you possibly can on your own money. Your life will be much easier. Taking on an investor—just like hiring your first employee—changes the game considerably. The founders are now responsible for, and accountable to, more than just themselves. This should be treated as a near-sacred commitment.
  4. Spend less than you think you should – Every start-up feels like they need to look larger than they are to be taken seriously in the marketplace. While this may be true, it does not automatically mean that you have to spend lavishly to keep up the appearance. Multiple companies I have been a part of looked for expansion and prospecting opportunities outside of their home market first where Southwest Airlines flew because of the lower airfare prices. One company was almost $20 million in revenue before we had our first office. Another, however, spent frivolously on consultants (a former politician that was paid to introduce the company to other politicians in Washington D.C.) and administrative assistants before we had any revenue because one founder wanted to be viewed as a player on the business stage. Every company needs to honor the fiduciary responsibilities that they have but start-ups need to bake this in to their company culture from inception.
  5. Raise more than you think you need – Every business plan you will ever see will include a pro-forma budget and revenue estimates for some time frame. While these are necessary to communicate the potential value of the organization to investors, a very wise person once gave me this advice: Cut all revenue estimates in half and double the amount of money needed to reach profitability. Once you do that you may be a bit closer to really understanding the financial prospects and needs of the company. Founders should do the same thing. Do you think it will take you $1 million to achieve profitability? Then try to raise $2 million. It is always easier to ask once for more than you need rather than having to go back and ask a second time because you underestimated the needs of the company. If you are concerned with diluting the shares in the company too much in an angel our first round of funding, do not be afraid to get a little creative with things like multiple stock classes or convertible debt.
  6. Do not have resources specialize – Most people that have been through a start-up have similar stories of being the CEO, switch board operator, salesperson, garbage collector, and business analyst all in the same day. Start-ups are, by their very nature, lean organizations when it comes to employees (although not always lean in other areas). You need highly talented individuals that are committed to the company and that do not mind rolling up their sleeves and getting their hands dirty. Even if it means cleaning the toilets from time-to-time. It is especially tempting for founders to feel like they need to specialize and delegate less palatable tasks but employees like leaders that lead by example. Besides, there will be plenty of time to worry about “highest and best use of time”, “role definition”, and teaching employees to “manage up” once you have enjoyed a certain level of success.
  7. Do not scrimp on the lawyers – While I certainly advocate start-ups scrutinizing every expense as if it will need to be paid with your very last dollar, you really cannot afford to scrimp on legal fees. LegalZoom.com may be a good resource to help you register your LLC in the Delaware, Florida, Nevada or whatever state you think will be most advantageous to you but you will quickly need more experienced counsel, especially if you are building a business around some form of intellectual property. You will want to find a lawyer that is a good fit for your business overall, and not just on the checkbook. Are you building the business with a transaction as an exit strategy (acquisition, IPO, etc.)? Find an attorney that has M&A experience. Are you a technology company that will have the majority of its value locked up in intellectual property? Find an attorney with direct software (or hardware) experience. Ask around. Interview several lawyers, get quotes on retainers and hourly rates, compare notes with others, and then select the one that best fits your needs. Then be prepared for the bill.
  8. Launch before you are ready – There is no such thing as perfection in this world, regardless of what subject you are evaluating. Humans are not perfect and neither are companies or products. There will always been room to perform so do not worry about having a perfect product at launch. Have a product (or service) that is good enough that customer’s value, put it out in the world, and get ready to listen to the feedback that will invariably be brought to your attention. If you wait for perfection, you will be waiting a very long time. So long, in fact that, assuming your idea is a good one, someone quicker than you will probably beat you to market. Additionally, all start-ups are built on assumptions; Lots of them. Launching early will allow you to test some of those assumptions (especially those about what the customer actually values) and make changes before additional investment is made.
  9. Iterate Quickly – When you launch before you are ready, you will have an immature, incomplete product (or service) on the market. You need to make sure you have appropriate feedback loops built so that you can iterate quickly with fixes and enhancements. You also need to have filters in place to ensure that the feedback you are listening to is appropriate for your situation. Just because your first (or biggest) customer asks for something new does not mean you should go out a build it. You need to have a vision for what you are selling, a vision that is shaped by what you are hearing, but also a vision that does not get pushed here, there any everywhere by the whims of the customer.
  10. Listen to your customers, especially when you do not like what they’re saying – The whims of the customer, may be vitally important. Read through the product reviews on Amazon sometime. What you will find are wide ranges of experiences with the same products. Some people absolutely love the newest widget for sale while others completely pan the same SKU. Who do you listen to? Neither extreme. Instead, listen to the feedback (especially the negative feedback) that is consistent across multiple customers. Find the trends. Address the needs of the masses while still staying true to your vision for your product. One start-up I worked with had commercialized some software from a large, academic medical center. The software worked great for them. But the consensus of early prospects and customers was that what worked for academia might not work in other settings. We pivoted just a bit, iterated quickly, and came out with an even stronger product.
  11. Good ideas do not always generate revenue – I love history. Especially European history. Especially European history from the Greek city-states through the Roman Empire. Based on this love, I have always had an interest in international business and expansion. During my tenure at one start-up I fell in love with the idea of taking our healthcare software to Europe and my CEO shared the same passion. It was a good idea but terrible timing. We spent an inordinate amount of time putting together a business plan when we had yet to sign our first contract domestically. The good idea took our eye off the tasks at hand and never led to a single Euro of revenue. I have what I think are some pretty good ideas every day. I keep a notebook for them. I will come back to some of them one day but many of them will simply be good ideas that should never be acted upon.
  12. Be wary of family money – Early-stage companies often raise angel money from individual investors and these individual investors are often family and friends. Dave Ramsey has a philosophy that states that family members should never loan money to one another. Rather, simply make the money a gift without strings so that when the money is not able to be repaid at a later date, no one gets upset because their expectations were not met. Even if family and friends want to invest in your start-up, you should set the expectation that they may very well never see a dimes worth of return and may lose all of their original investment. This way everyone will be pleasantly surprised when you do generate a good return for Grandpa Smith.
  13. Be careful with your board – The Board of Directors is not a vanity exercise. Some people want to be on a board because they like the way it looks on their resume. Some founders add “Chairman” to their title because they believe it means that they have “made it”. Either attitude or approach is dangerous to your company. Founders should attempt to fill their board with individuals, investors, and advisors that add value to the company. Seats should be ruthlessly guarded and if a member is not discharging their duties appropriately they should be replaced according to the by-laws governing the board. Large investors are sometimes given a board seat in recognition of their financial commitment to the company. Be careful with early-stage angel investors, however. They need to fully understand the role of the board and what will be asked of them if they are added to it.
  14. Do not drink the Kool-Aid® – Entrepreneurs MUST have passion for what they are building. If they are not, they will not be willing to make the sacrifices necessary to make their vision in to reality. Employees need to be careful of this passion, however. Employees should believe first in the product, not the CEO. Miss-guided passion can blind founders and employees alike to the realities of their business. Passion can make people myopic; Make them believe their own press and everything that is coming out of their own mouths even though the fundamental reality of the business does not support this blind faith. A charismatic, rock star-like CEO can be an asset to a company, but they must be pragmatic and willing to listen to counsel that may run contrary to their vision to be successful over the long-term.

This is my personal list. If someone has ever been a part of a start-up, regardless of the level of success that organization eventually enjoyed, they will have a different list. Have you learned other lessons? Leave a comment below or contact me and I will add it to my list (with full credit give to you, of course).

Filed Under: Entrepreneurship Tagged With: Entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management

Bootstrapping vs. Funding

August 5, 2010 by Zach Evans

In my career I’ve been blessed to be a part of companies (relatively) large ($150 million-plus) and small. On the small side, I’ve been a part of one company that sought (and received) outside funding and one that bootstrapped its way to profitability, which is what makes a recent article on ReadWriteWeb so interesting to me.

My first small company experience was with an angel investor-funded start-up that had licensed some intellectual property from Vanderbilt University’s Office of Technology Transfer and Enterprise Development. I was employee three and we raised about $1 million, hung out our shingle and started selling. Subsequent funding was later sought and was partially raised. The company struggled for a while before being sold to a larger organization primarily for the assumption of debt.

My second small company experience is (I’m still employed at CareHere) with a company that was bootstrapped by its two co-founders.  When I joined the company was doing a couple million dollars in annual revenue and I was employee number eight. The company has been profitable since day one and continues to grow by leaps-and-bounds—even in the worst economy in several generations.

The above-mentioned article, entitled “The Downside of Bootstrapping”, poses one possible theory of why my two experiences were so different: Focus. (UPDATE: Here’s another word that all start-ups need to understand: Urgency.)

Bootstrapped companies work with only two types of funding: That contributed directly by the founders or that contributed directly from business operations. Either way, employees of these organizations HAVE to be more focused because they simply don’t have the same level of cushioning that companies with outside funding (may) have. In other words, it’s easier to get distracted when you’re working with someone else’s money.

Bootstrapped companies, however, have a major weakness that’s pointed out in the article (along with a couple of other important thoughts). That weakness is that it’s often harder for them to scale. The reason for this is that business expansion in these type of organizations are typically funded out of cash flow and that cash flow simply isn’t growing fast enough to finance much more than incremental growth.

One notable exception to this quasi-rule is when a bootstrapped company operates in an industry that is rapidly growing and, therefore, the company can grow faster without a lot of cash flow. CareHere operates within such an industry–on-site healthcare–and has been able to grow very quickly. Entrepreneurs should never underestimate the power of being in the right business and the right time.

Investor-funded companies can be focused, too, and the successful ones are. I’m not sure if that’s where my other small company experience went wrong but I definitely think that it helped move us down a path where we didn’t want to go. Regardless, staying focused on where the cash is going and guarding every cent like it’s your last one is important for any company. Taking risks is ok—that’s what starting a business is all about anyway—but not paying attention is an unforgivable sin.

Have you ever been a part of a small company start up or stared a company on your own? If so, what route did you go down: Bootstrapping or outside investors?

UPDATE: A great article from O’Reilly has just been posted entitled “The VC-free startup“.

Filed Under: Entrepreneurship Tagged With: Angel Investors, Bootstrapping, Cash Flow, Entrepreneurs, Miscellany, Venture Capital

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Favorite Coach Sayings–Even If They’re Cliche
  • Adoption Facts & Statistics
  • Where Opportunity Meets Mission
  • Middle Tennessee Outlaws vs Grassland Rampage
  • Rethinking Support

Footer

Tags

Adoption Baseball Career Careers Change Charity Coaching Communication Costs Customer Service Education EHR EMR Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Family Healthcare HIE IT Knowledge Leadership Lipscomb Management Margin Miscellany Motivation Nashville Networking Office Perfection Privacy Productivity Project Governance project management project prioritization Projects Responsibility Spending Teams Technology Training Travel Venture Capital Waffle House Work Week

Popular Thoughts

  • Baseball Coaching Resources
  • Garage Storage
  • Favorite Coach Sayings--Even If They're Cliche

Latest Tweet

  • If you don’t know who @TheAmandaGorman is, you should. Her poem, read out to the world today during the inauguratio… https://t.co/Ta0jZS676Q January 20, 2021 5:29 PM

Connect with Me

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Resume
  • Thoughts
  • Projects
  • Resources
  • Contact

Copyright © 2010-2019 Zach Evans. All Rights Reserved. Built by E6 Advisors.